Last Update 21:27
Tuesday, 18 December 2018

On the precipice

Egypt is on the brink of an economic and security abyss which is indicated in the military operations taking place on the border, the figures on national reserves, and developments in foreign relations.

Abdel Moneim Said , Wednesday 26 Sep 2012
Views: 1528
Views: 1528

When political forces in Egypt ascertained that the Muslim Brotherhood (MB) and other political entities that represent it – the group’s political wing the Freedom and Justice Party (FJP), the candidates who won the confidence of the people such as the president and members of People's Assembly and Shura Council – have a firm hold on power, there have been many concerns about what will happen to the country.

For example, there is fear that the group’s position regarding the Egyptian-Israeli peace treaty could trigger a war that consumes everything and everyone, which would make development efforts impossible. But in all honesty, the group’s response was reassuring; it rejected the need to go to war and said it respects all agreements signed by Egypt.

In pragmatic terms, it adopted a balanced position when the Israeli embassy was attacked, and after President Morsi came to power coordination between Egypt and Israel has continued.

After the Rafah attack where 17 Egyptian soldiers were killed, the president ordered an overhaul of the Armed Forces and sent a large number of troops to Area C – naturally, after coordinating with Israel.

And thus, it appears the “group” kept its word but what is happening on the ground seems to be an alarming harbinger. Salafist jihadist groups are heavily present in Sinai and are able of attacking the Armed Forces, civilian institutions, and even Israel. These groups seem adamant on imposing a reality on Egypt that is similar to Hizbullah in Lebanon, namely moving on Israel with complete independence from the state.

This would put Egypt in a position it does not want, namely when responses to Salafist jihadist attacks do not come from across the border in Israel, but from inside Egyptian territories. While Egypt could not remain silent in such a circumstance, any action would be unconvincing to the world because the country’s official and popular position is not decisive or resolute regarding these developments.

Even more disconcerting is the way the “group” and “rulers” handled the crisis over the hapless film and how it spread to the US embassy, which undermined Egyptian-US relations and in turn undermined a key guarantee of the Egyptian-Israeli peace treaty. Such a development cannot be offset by Egyptian-Chinese relations not only in terms of grants, aid and international influence, but more importantly the Egyptian-Israeli peace treaty.

Circumstances like this usually snowball into a bigger problem if the domestic front is not in the best shape. There are some positive steps being taken to combat corruption, the Constituent Assembly is trying to finalise a constitution, and attempts to create large coalitions that could reset the balance on the political scene to end what is described as MB “takeover” and hegemony.


At the same time, there is something more sinister: the Ministry of Interior recently announced that 1,400 strikes, sit-ins and protests took place within the past 48 days. This is almost as many as throughout 2010 before the revolution, but in the past this was not accompanied with road barricades, immobilising railway services, suspending work in public institutions and at such a large scale.


It is difficult to describe them as exceptions that cross the line between revolution and chaos, especially since they occur in all sectors and in some that are especially sensitive such as public transportation and education. The minister of industry has even declared that if the status quo continues the national economy will collapse.


It is an alarming situation. There is a threat that we could be submerged into a war that neither the state, government nor the political majority wanted. Meanwhile, the economy is threatened with complete collapse despite huge efforts to attract foreign and domestic investments. The reality that everyone inside and outside the country sees discourages both from launching new production operations, especially since there are 4,500 shuttered factories and power plants that are unable to meet the needs of customers, whether producers or consumers.


What is surprising is that after tangible improvements were made regarding Egypt’s reputation on the world stage, because of fair and free elections and the president’s conscientious moves, we are now entering tensions that could have been avoided and a crisis with the US that could have been evaded as we stand on the threshold of launching talks on an IMF loan and amid US electioneering.

All this is because the MB does not want any of Islamist Salafist or jihadist groups to beat it in responding to provocations by malicious groups that want to drag Egypt into a serious clash with various world powers.

Governance, irrespective of its ideological and intellectual orientation, requires a deep breath based on research within its institutions and among its aids and advisers. It also requires consulting various political forces and opinion makers in information centres and think tanks on how to deal with these threats to Egypt’s national security.

Egypt could soon be facing an economic and security catastrophe. Its indicators are shown in the military operations taking place on the border, the falling figures on national reserves, and recent developments in foreign relations. In all honesty, if we do not confront these with the necessary determination and resolve we will find ourselves in a catastrophic situation that is even worse than the 1967 defeat.

That war was an outside aggression and the political leadership remained steadfast and solid, but this time we are facing a breakdown that would prevent schools from functioning; transportation from moving; factories from producing; electricity from lighting; a country disconnected from each other; and a world concerned about the number of terrorist groups that are running wild up and down country threatening neighbouring states.

This is not why we had a revolution, and not even what the MB wants, whether or not we agree with them. This is not the Egypt we or they want.

Short link:


Ahram Online welcomes readers' comments on all issues covered by the site, along with any criticisms and/or corrections. Readers are asked to limit their feedback to a maximum of 1000 characters (roughly 200 words). All comments/criticisms will, however, be subject to the following code
  • We will not publish comments which contain rude or abusive language, libelous statements, slander and personal attacks against any person/s.
  • We will not publish comments which contain racist remarks or any kind of racial or religious incitement against any group of people, in Egypt or outside it.
  • We welcome criticism of our reports and articles but we will not publish personal attacks, slander or fabrications directed against our reporters and contributing writers.
  • We reserve the right to correct, when at all possible, obvious errors in spelling and grammar. However, due to time and staffing constraints such corrections will not be made across the board or on a regular basis.

sawsan mostafa ali
27-09-2012 09:14am
FIRST: CONTROLLING THE BORDERS: 1- An electronic system. 2- To destroy Rafah. 3- To destroy tunnels. 4- 5 km width area along the borders to be banned on civilians. 5-Even to help Israel in building the fence between us. 6- A foreign policy to show the world how we are determined to evacuate Sinai from all malicious groups. 2nd: The Prime Minister: What did he do since taking power to solve the protesting crisis on a national level?- nothing at all. 3rd: The 3rd current: Can this very active current ( especially Amr Moussa and Hamdien Sabahi) play an effective role in solving the national crisis of protesting and explaining to Eg. what we are facing (We are all in the same boat and any one can give a hand - let him do). (( Thank you Dr. Saeed - as although yr article made us worry a lot about Egypt - but it shows us where we really stand)).
Comment's Title

26-09-2012 04:35pm
Threats to Egypt’s national security
Thank you for your views in this article. They highlight that in such a new democracy, the rules of law and corporate governance must be introduced and followed. People have the right to strike and demonstrate but they must first negociate with their employer to resolve the dispute. If no resolution, they must seek a permission to strike from a neutral authority, such as an Industrial Relations Commission, which should be empowered to approve or deny the request after careful consideration of the national interest. Strikes which will stop transportaion or cut electricity are examples of those where the Commission can reject the request to strike and issue a ruling to resolve the dispute; such ruling should be binding to all parties with the right to appeal in a High Court. This Commission should also be empowered to order the end of a strike. As for foreign policy and national security guidelines, these are the policies of the party with majority in the Parliament, which is the MB at
Comment's Title

Ahmed M Ibrahim
26-09-2012 01:29pm
Egypt on the brink.
In order to get rid of President Mubarak, some people have committed a "harakiri" which has immobilized Egypt to an extent beyond repair. Religious fanaticism, economic and political isolation has deprived Egypt of its ability to lead. Foreign policy is in shambles and decades of hard work has gone into waste. Relations with clerical Iran will spell disaster for Egypt. Today Egypt is surrounded by unstable and tottering governments in Sudan, Syria and Libya while the border with Israel has become volatile after decades of peace. These are ominous signs which no well wisher of Egypt could ignore. Mr.Adel Moneim Said has done well to project them in the proper perspective.
Comment's Title

© 2010 Ahram Online.