Last Update 23:23
To curb extremism Egypt must revamp university curricula
Considering the notable number of Egyptian extremists who have medical and engineering degrees, a critical examination of Egypt's education system and myopic approach to learning is necessary
Khaled Fahmy , Saturday 27 Oct 2012
Share/Bookmark
Views: 1874

In 1980, Saadeddin Ibrahim published in English an analysis of the social background of two pioneer political Islam groups in Egypt. After acquiring the necessary security passes, Ibrahim made prison visits to talk with members of the Military Technical College and El-Rl-Takfeer wa El-Hijra (Excommunication and Exodus) groups who were jailed after carrying out violent attacks that killed dozens, such as seizing the Military Technical School in 1974, and kidnapping and murdering former Minister of Religious Endowments Sheikh Dahabi in 1977.

A key observation Ibrahim made about the academic background of these two groups is that most of them are university students or university graduates. Even more important is that 80 per cent of his subjects attended professional colleges such as medicine, engineering and pharmaceuticals. Also significant is that two key members of Al-Qaeda also graduated from professional schools in Egypt: Ayman Al-Zawahri – Al-Qaeda’s number two– graduated from Qasr Al-Aini School of Medicine in 1974 and earned his MSc in surgery from Assiut University in 1978. Mohamed Atta, who the FBI describes as the mastermind of the 9/11 attacks, has an architecture degree from Cairo University.

Of course there is no direct link between studying medicine and engineering, or attending Egyptian universities in general, with extremism or what is described as "terrorism." I do, however, make a link specifically between extremism and how medicine and engineering are taught and teaching methods at Egyptian universities in general.

There are, of course, many reasons behind religious fanaticism, whether peaceful or violent. Hundreds of books have been written in many languages exploring the social, economic, political and psychological reasons behind extremism. Without diminishing the significance of all these factors, I believe we need to also closely examine the fact that many members of extremist political Islamic groups are university graduates and that the majority of these graduates – not all of them of course – studied at professional universities.

There are many studies about festering problems at Egyptian universities; everyone knows how the education process is influenced by several aspects such as large numbers of students in classes and laboratories, small budgets, low pay for faculty, lacking or inadequate laboratories, libraries and other research resources to generate knowledge. There are many inhibiting factors and hundreds of studies about substandard teaching techniques, focusing on memorising rather than understanding and inferior curricula.

While all these factors are significant and important, I believe the key reason for the breakdown in Egypt’s university education is only focusing on one’s field of study.  By that I mean the (mistaken) belief that the best way to train a university student is deepening knowledge of their specialty subject and not to expand their knowledge about other subjects. This is especially prevalent in professional colleges such as medicine whereby students are there for at least seven years studying various branches of medicine without any knowledge of the history of their profession, or Egypt’s health insurance policies, or hospital design and administration. And what about other subjects that have nothing to do with medicine such as music, philosophy or literature?

Meanwhile, an engineering student studies various branches of engineering for five years without learning about modern Arab literature or Renaissance art or reading Islamic philosophy. But what is the connection between architecture and Islamic philosophy? How will a medical student benefit from studying Shakespeare or Pharaonic history? Are these just a waste of time and opportunity for a genuine education?

These are obvious and pertinent questions, and the answer to them is rooted in the approach of "liberal arts" that does not exist in our universities, which could be a reason for religious fanaticism. "Liberal arts" has nothing to do with liberal ideology but is a derivative of the Latin word liber, or "free." It means acquiring the skills and faculties that a free person – i.e. not a slave – should have, essentially, the ability for critical thinking; verbal expression of opinion; writing in an articulate concisely and to listen, converse and debate in a critical manner.

University education based on this approach does not aim to produce students who know everything about their field but nothing about the other branches of science. Instead, students become skilled in creative thinking and engaging in quiet dialogue about a subject that has nothing to do with their field. Also, finding unconventional solutions for problems they may face in the workplace and communicating with others in a more persuasive manner and influencing them through civilised peaceful means.

Most US and European universities are built on liberal education which is dissimilar than in-depth field –specific specialisation. Classes related to the economy that economics students study at Yale University, for example, account for no more than half their course load and the remaining courses could be in political science, statistics, music, philosophy, mathematics or even Chinese.

Meanwhile, an English literature graduate from the University of California could have also studied the history of cinema, political science and the history of science.

Everyone, whether professors, parents, students and employers all acknowledge that not everyone who studies commerce will become a merchant or if they study business administration they would become a businessman or an English literature student will be the next Shakespeare. On the contrary, everyone knows that a skilled diplomat does not have a degree in political science, and anyone who wants to be a writer does not have to graduate with a degree in literature.

There is a general belief that the curricula of a liberal arts education not only encourages raising a free citizen but are also necessary for the job market. Field-specific colleges in commerce, political science and economics, medicine and engineering began more than half a century ago when the market needed specific skills for a particular job that the graduate hoped he would be recruited for and remain there until he retires.

Today, however, most graduates will be asked to hop from one assignment and job to the next within the same company, or move from one company to another. This is why they need to be armed with skills and faculties that enable them to deal with aggressive fluctuations and challenges in the job market.

There are, of course, many reasons behind the breakdown of our universities, but the absence of liberal arts education remains a key reason. Our universities played a pioneer and pivotal role in society’s renaissance and boosting the economy at a certain point in time, but now the time has come to overhaul the approach to university education. We should not limit debate to its mechanisms, economics and ideologies but instead reconstruct university curricula to successfully train students to be more competitive on the job market. Also, so as to produce free citizens who can creatively connect with their society.
______________________________________________________________
The writer is a historian and head of the Committee for Documenting the Revolution at the Egyptian National Library and Archives





Short link:

 

Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
Ahram Online welcomes readers' comments on all issues covered by the site, along with any criticisms and/or corrections. Readers are asked to limit their feedback to a maximum of 4000 characters (roughly 200 words). All comments/criticisms will, however, be subject to the following code
  • We will not publish comments which contain rude or abusive language, libelous statements, slander and personal attacks against any person/s.
  • We will not publish comments which contain racist remarks or any kind of racial or religious incitement against any group of people, in Egypt or outside it.
  • We welcome criticism of our reports and articles but we will not publish personal attacks, slander or fabrications directed against our reporters and contributing writers.
  • We reserve the right to correct, when at all possible, obvious errors in spelling and grammar. However, due to time and staffing constraints such corrections will not be made across the board or on a regular basis.
3



Kent
01-11-2012 09:20pm
2-
3+
What is extremism?
what is eextremism? Is communism a form of extremism? Is anti-religious secularism a form of extremism? I think we have to define extremism before we use it loosely.
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
2



Nora
30-10-2012 06:26am
11-
20+
Egypt new enemy???
There is a trending to blame Islam on the decay of the society. The article ignored that fact that Egypt has tried mix of socialism , communism, and capitalism. In the process of each phase, more oppression and ignorance have accumulated. In the eyes of Liberals and Left, Islam is to be blamed. If a Muslim has a post graduate degree, then there must be something wrong with the education system. If a Muslim has no formal education, then he must be a fanatic. Please note that Egypt is in the current situation because of the long term corrupted systems that it endured i.e. We have tried your ways before and it has not worked. The society needs to acknowledge the unfair treatment and imprisonment of Muslims during the last 60 years. I have seen students that were taken away and put in prison, during their finals, just because they choice to grow facial hair. Extreme left has caused the extreme right.
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
mumby
04-11-2012 09:35am
0-
1+
U right
Ye leftis did worse.In Gamal Nasser era tens thusonds imprison because they keeps with islamic cause
Ahmed Malek
31-10-2012 01:19am
20-
8+
No
Sorry there was no unfair treatment of muslims just opression of religious fanatics, the LEFT or LIBERALS never try and force their ideology on anyone, the ihkwan however do.
Anonymous
30-10-2012 07:33pm
3-
16+
Thank You
What a suberb insight, thank you for expressing it so eloquently.
1



Free Lady
28-10-2012 02:30pm
27-
22+
Religious Marketing
Salafist are effectively marketing the religion with empty slogan of "Heaven". The targeted recipients are lower middle and poor class youth. They are offered and guided a to life long way to get heaven through prayers and follow Sharia Or follow short cut of Jihad. In 1980s mainstream Western media promoted Jihad and Salafist to hire recruits for Afghan Jihad against USSR and Iran-Iraq war from Muslim world. Since then Salafist got their way into Muslim societies promoting their specific Sharia, hate theories and armed struggle. The Islamic world could not recognize the menace since recently. Now fortunately after three decades of horrible destruction and loss of Muslims lives, Muslims around the world are raising their voice against Salafist and their terrorist activities. Its the time for institutions like Al Azhar to stand up against this menace and teach the youth real spiritual Islam. That Islam which teaches us to sacrifice our lives for other human and Muslims for sake of Allah
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
Oscar
30-10-2012 07:06pm
11-
19+
Free Lady Anarchy & Mayhem Marketing
Free Lady , what are you marketing, anarchy, and mayhem. You were not as a Free Lady in Pharoah Mubarak era. You are getting too mouthy against Salafist, and MB. What about those LIbs, and Copts. You dont dare to criticize those Copts who are running the circus of papal selection with all the fanfare, and still cry they are not treated well, and spread propaganda in the Christian world that Copts are very oppressed people in Egypt. Big fat liers.

© 2010 Ahram Online. Advertising