Last Update 16:54
Elections, or no elections -- that is the question
Both the Islamists and the ruling Supreme Council of the Armed Forces are positioning themselves in the run-up to this month’s legislative elections
Mona Anis , Thursday 17 Nov 2011
Share/Bookmark
Views: 3001

Egyptian political forces go to the polls in a fortnight’s time as polarised and divided as they have ever been. While the Islamists, led by the Muslim Brotherhood, are readying themselves for a ballot-box victory they believe they well deserve after the major role they played in bringing down the Mubarak regime, their liberal and secular adversaries are busy devising schemes to ensure that such a victory does not give the Islamists a free rein in drafting the country's new constitution, which will be written under the supervision of the newly elected parliament.

On the other hand, the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces (SCAF), Egypt's de facto ruler in the transitional period, is the one political grouping set to gain the most from this division. The SCAF's early promises of handing over power in six months have now been replaced by a murky and open-ended transitional road-map that leaves the military in power for all of next year and possibly for a good part of 2013 as well. Even more disheartening is the set of supra-constitutional principles that the military now seeks to impose on the future constituent assembly charged with drafting the country's new constitution. These proposed principles include the right of the SCAF to veto any legislation concerning the army, as well as to bar parliament from overseeing the military budget.

As I write, the battle that has long been raging between those in favour of the supra-constitutional principles and those against them is about to draw to a conclusion one way or the other. A document containing the proposed supra-constitutional principles, prepared by deputy prime minister Aly El-Selmy, was submitted for discussion two weeks ago, and it will either be passed or abandoned some time soon. When it was first brought to public attention, the document caused uproar, as its main purpose seemed to be to entrench the position of the army above the legislature, making the military what some have called “a state above the state.”
 

Some of the more controversial articles have now (Tuesday 15 November) been amended, and the fate of the document should be decided before Friday 18 November, the date set by the Islamists, including the Brotherhood and its political wing the Freedom and Justice Party (FJP), to take to the streets of many of Egypt's major cities if what is now popularly known as “El-Selmy's document” is not dropped.

It is not yet clear whether this threat will be carried through, as the Brotherhood is well aware that such a move might turn out to be a double-edged sword. When the rank and file of the more orthodox Islamist groups responded to a similar call on one Friday this summer and converged on Tahrir Square from the provinces outside Cairo, their sheer numbers sent shock waves through the country’s liberal and secular forces, prompting them to call that Friday "Kandahar Friday", as a snub to the many people dressed in a similar fashion to Afghanistan's Taliban who had filled the streets of downtown Cairo.

On an organisational level, the Brotherhood should not be confused with the orthodox Salafists, but it should nevertheless not be forgotten that at the level of popular sentiment, such groups are closer to the Brotherhood than they are to any other political force in the country. And it is these Salafists and their various demands that most scare moderate Egyptians and could drive them away from voting for the Brotherhood. As a result, the latter group has been keen to distance itself at least politically from the salafists. A lot will now depend on whether a compromise of sorts regarding El-Selmy’s document can be reached between the Brotherhood and the SCAF before Friday, as the existing balance of power is so precarious that a Friday marked by mass Islamist mobilisation a few days from election day on 28 November could easily wreck it and ruin the electoral process that the Brotherhood so desperately yearns for.

The power of the Islamists notwithstanding, there are also other minor radical forces among the young that are against elections being held in the present uncertain state of affairs, these arguing that the Revolution has now been nigh-on lost and that there is a need to re-ignite its spark by confronting the SCAF head on. Such groups have been leading a bold and brave campaign against military trials for civilians and other military violations of human rights for several months now, and while this has caught public attention it has not so far drawn a large following.

The arrest two weeks ago of the well-known blogger Alaa Abd El-Fattah and the attempt to press serious charges against him, such as allegations that he assaulted soldiers who were on duty, is an attempt by the SCAF to deter and silence such groups before the anti-SCAF movement spreads to larger sections of the population. Resentment of the SCAF is growing, and the calculation would seem to be that if the elections are allowed to take their planned three-month course (the period stipulated for electing both the lower and upper houses of parliament), the SCAF will be able to regain some of the popularity it enjoyed at the beginning of the January uprising, when most people believed the army was going to hand over power in a few months.

On the other hand, there are also many observers who believe that the present level of violence that is spreading in the country, especially in the provinces, is bound to escalate once the elections process is set in motion, and that this could furnish the SCAF with the opportunity it needs to call off the elections and impose a state of martial law until calm is restored.

If this happens, then we are back full-circle to the situation in 1954, when the Free Officers, who had overthrown the monarchy in July 1952, liquidated all existing political parties and ruled the country single-handed, continuing to do so in subsequent incarnations until a few months ago. In order to comfort ourselves against a doomsday scenario of this sort, we could at least remember that history does not repeat itself.
 





Short link:

 

Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
Ahram Online welcomes readers' comments on all issues covered by the site, along with any criticisms and/or corrections. Readers are asked to limit their feedback to a maximum of 1000 characters (roughly 50 words). All comments/criticisms will, however, be subject to the following code
  • We will not publish comments which contain rude or abusive language, libelous statements, slander and personal attacks against any person/s.
  • We will not publish comments which contain racist remarks or any kind of racial or religious incitement against any group of people, in Egypt or outside it.
  • We welcome criticism of our reports and articles but we will not publish personal attacks, slander or fabrications directed against our reporters and contributing writers.
  • We reserve the right to correct, when at all possible, obvious errors in spelling and grammar. However, due to time and staffing constraints such corrections will not be made across the board or on a regular basis.
2



Same old pharaos
19-11-2011 02:03pm
1-
1+
Learn your history!
Just like Sadat. Just like Nasser. The professionals and the students lead the calls for a freedom revolution. The army pretends to agree. Then denounce the intelligent people as being foreign influenced. Who's left? The largely uneducated Islamists from poor uneducated areas. Easier to manipulate. They sell out and denounce everyone who doesn't agree with them as infidels and kaffirs. The army uses them until they turn on the army. Next? The army turns on the Islamists. The Islamists start talking of martyrs. Violence arises. The intelligent and general people turn to the army as the alternative to Islamic terrorists. Expect Tantawi or a leading general to resign just before the presidential election. He stands as a civilian. Result? A military dictatorship masquerading as a civilian government. Majority of Egyptians accept it. Islamists persecuted. No freedom for Egypt. The only thing that can stop it is for Islamists to keep to their 30%. 30% to Wafd
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment
1



Dr Sayed Khatab
17-11-2011 04:50pm
0-
1+
The Egyptians could do it.
The parliamentary election in Egypt is around the corner. The first round will begin on November 28th (2011). Egypt is the object of the world’s hops. The world is very much focusing on Egypt and wishing for Egypt all success. The world wants Egypt to succeed in this difficult period of time and safely get over its difficulties and cross from the unknown shore to the shore of peace and democracy. The success of Egypt will certainly be a success for every Egyptian irrespective of ideological or political difference. It will be a success for all Arabs. This success of Egypt is a great sign for the future of the change in the region. It indicates that the region will turn to democracy, social justice, human rights, and power sharing. Otherwise, there is nothing unfortunately other than chaos. However, we believe that the Egyptians can do it and have the knowledge, the morals, the capacity and inclinations to carry out this project safely and peacefully. Here, the media has a big role in
Email
 
Name
 
Comment's Title
 
Comment

© 2010 Ahram Online. Advertising