Southern Sudan President Salva Kiir looks at his inked finger after casting his vote in front of a cheering crowd of hundreds of Sudanese voters in Juba, Southern Sudan, Sunday, Jan. 9, 2011(Photo: AP)
Former civil war foes Sudan and South Sudan have told mediators they are ready to end one of Africa's longest conflicts this weekend, but behind the diplomacy their relationship is one of enduring mistrust and enmity.
With an army of advisers and experts pressuring both sides, the leaders of the neighbouring nations may feel compelled to reach a limited agreement in Addis Ababa to end hostilities, for now, after coming close to war in April.
Faced with crumbling economies, Sudan's President Omar Hassan Al-Bashir and his southern counterpart Salva Kiir were expected to reach an agreement during a summit Sunday to allow oil exports to resume.
The leaders have the extra pressure of a threat of possible sanctions from the U.N. Security Council if they do not resolve their disputes this weekend.
The United States, Britain and Norway, which have served as mediators in the conflict, issued a joint statement saying the Addis Ababa meeting represents "an extraordinary opportunity for Sudan and South Sudan to demonstrate, on behalf of their people, a shared recommitment to peace."
The mediators cited substantive progress on several issues, but said it was imperative that the two sides finalise security arrangements, get oil flowing again and work to resolve differences over Southern Kordofan and Blue Nile states.
But diplomats at the peace talks say neither side seems to have a genuine intention of putting the decades of conflict behind them and resolving all remaining disputes left over from South Sudan's messy secession in July 2011.
"There is a sense of disappointment among mediators that both sides will only take one step forward. They are not ready for a lasting peace deal," said a senior diplomat. "It is more constructive than last time but I don't see a comprehensive deal," he said.
Both delegations see the talks, the latest in a series hosted by the African Union, as a way to show their people they are being tough on their neighbour and to deflect public anger over economic crises at home.
"These talks are about containing a crisis rather than solving a conflict," said a Western diplomat. "You have a generation of people on both sides for which the conflict has become part of their lives. They don't really act as statesmen but see themselves as opponents," he said.
At the venue — the Sheraton Hotel — the delegations, both about 20-strong, rarely meet directly and talk to each other only in negotiating rooms and in the presence of mediators.
Both sides tend to sit at separate tables when dining. They even often sit on different benches during breaks in talks.
The main sticking points in negotiations have been where to mark the border and how much landlocked South Sudan, which seceded under a 2005 peace deal that ended decades of open war, should pay to export oil through northern pipelines.
Last month, the neighbours reached an interim deal to restart southern oil exports through the north, but Sudan also wants a border security deal, which both parties are trying to hammer out at this latest round of negotiations.
The new talks began 4 September but little happened in the first 10 days as discussions focused on repeating old statements or questioning details of last month's interim oil deal.
Khartoum sent in a delegation of tribesmen from the border area, signalling its seriousness to stake a claim to a strip of disputed land. The tribesmen have not taken part in official talks, but their presence at the hotel was a message that Sudan would not budge on that issue.
While Sudanese officials mostly kept to themselves, the southern delegation spread out in the hotel, beaming with confidence while meeting diplomats in cafes.
"You have here two sides who signal to each other, 'We are under no pressure to sign anything,' so things have been slow," said another diplomat.
Western powers hope once oil flows resume, the nations will have an incentive to keep talking. However, some diplomats say that once the economies stabilise, hardliners on both sides might pressure their governments into more conflict.
"The borders will take forever. They will exchange maps with experts, visit each other, go maybe into arbitration," said one ambassador.
There is also no sign of progress to settle the fate of the Abyei border region which is highly symbolic to both sides.